Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-07-05

SAI BHASKAR IRON LTD. vs A.P.ELECT.REGUL.COMMISSION .

Citation / case number
SC 2014/14899
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SAI BHASKAR IRON LTD.
Respondent
A.P.ELECT.REGUL.COMMISSION .
Author
ARUN MISHRA V. GOPALA GOWDA
Bench
ARUN MISHRA V. GOPALA GOWDA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission's tariff orders must comply with the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, particularly Sections 61 and 62, which mandate that tariffs should be determined in a transparent manner and reflect the cost of supply. The Court emphasized the need for regulatory bodies to ensure fair pricing and protect consumer interests while balancing the financial viability of electricity suppliers. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the Commission's orders as valid and lawful.

SAI BHASKAR IRON LTD. vs A.P.ELECT.REGUL.COMMISSION . · Niyam