Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-07-12

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs ANITA & ANR ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 2012/32974
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Respondent
ANITA & ANR ETC.
Author
T.S. THAKUR,R. BANUMATHI,UDAY UMESH LALIT
Bench
T.S. THAKUR,R. BANUMATHI,UDAY UMESH LALIT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of the appointment of Legal Advisors, Law Officers, and Law Instructors in Maharashtra, created under Government Resolutions dated 21.08.2006 and 15.09.2006. The Court upheld the High Court's decision that the contractual nature of these appointments was arbitrary and unreasonable, thus affirming the need for regularization of services. The Court ruled that the appointments should not be merely contractual and directed the State to consider regularization of the respondents' services.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs ANITA & ANR ETC. · Niyam