Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-07-13

Maninderjit Singh Bitta vs Vijay Chhibber & Ors

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2016 SC 712
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Maninderjit Singh Bitta
Respondent
Vijay Chhibber & Ors
Author
R. Banumathi
Bench
R. Banumathi, R.K. Agrawal, T.S. Thakur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed contempt petitions regarding the non-implementation of the High Security Registration Plates (HSRP) scheme, which was mandated by its previous orders in Maninderjit Singh Bitta vs. Union of India & Ors. The Court emphasized the statutory duty of the respondents under Section 64 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Rule 50 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 to ensure compliance with the HSRP scheme. The Court held that the failure to act against the violators constituted contempt, thereby reinforcing the necessity of adherence to its directives.

Maninderjit Singh Bitta vs Vijay Chhibber & Ors · Niyam