Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-07-25

Sukh Ram vs State Of H.P

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT 3548
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sukh Ram
Respondent
State Of H.P
Author
R. Banumathi
Bench
R. Banumathi, V.Gopala Gowda

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction of Sukh Ram under Sections 468 and 471 IPC for forgery and using forged documents, rejecting the trial court's reliance on the decision in Sukhvinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab, (1994) 5 SCC 152. The Court emphasized that the evidence, including the handwriting expert's opinion, sufficiently established the appellant's involvement in misappropriating government loans by forging signatures. The Court confirmed the six-month imprisonment sentence imposed by the High Court, affirming the legal principle that forgery and use of forged documents are serious offenses under IPC.

Sukh Ram vs State Of H.P · Niyam