Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-07-22

Santosh Singh vs Union Of India And Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT 3456
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Santosh Singh
Respondent
Union Of India And Anr
Author
D Y Chandrachud
Bench
D Y Chandrachud, T S Thakur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution concerning the inclusion of moral education in the school curriculum, asserting that the State has a constitutional obligation to promote moral values in education. The petitioner argued that the absence of moral science as a compulsory subject violates Article 25, which guarantees freedom of conscience, and undermines the fundamental duties outlined in Article 51A(f). The Court emphasized the importance of integrating moral education to foster constitutional values and national character, ultimately recognizing the need for educational reforms to address societal moral degradation.

Santosh Singh vs Union Of India And Anr · Niyam