Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-07-12

State Of Maharashtra & Ors vs Anita & Anr Etc

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT 3333
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Maharashtra & Ors
Respondent
Anita & Anr Etc
Author
R. Banumathi
Bench
Uday Umesh Lalit, R. Banumathi, T.S. Thakur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of the appointments of 471 Legal Advisors, Law Officers, and Law Instructors created under Government Resolutions dated 21.08.2006 and 15.09.2006, which were intended to be contractual. The Court upheld the High Court's ruling that these posts are permanent but clarified that the appointments made were not in accordance with constitutional provisions, thus denying claims for regularization. The Court ultimately dismissed the appeals, maintaining the status of the appointments as contractual and not permanent.

State Of Maharashtra & Ors vs Anita & Anr Etc · Niyam