Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-01-19

BOBBILI RAMAKRISHNA RAJU YADAV vs STATE OF A P REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF A P HYDERBAD A P

Citation / case number
SC 2014/33338
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BOBBILI RAMAKRISHNA RAJU YADAV
Respondent
STATE OF A P REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF A P HYDERBAD A P
Author
R. BANUMATHI
Bench
T.S. THAKUR,A.K. SIKRI,R. BANUMATHI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to not quash the proceedings against the appellants under Section 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The Court clarified that the charges in the earlier FIR No. 1492 of 2008 under Sections 304B and 498A IPC, along with Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, are distinct from the subsequent complaint under Section 6, which is independent and does not overlap with the previous case. The Court affirmed that the Magistrate was correct in taking cognizance of the complaint, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

BOBBILI RAMAKRISHNA RAJU YADAV vs STATE OF A P REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF A P HYDERBAD A P · Niyam