Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-01-28

VIPINCHANDRA VADILAL BAVISHI (D) BY LRS & ANR. vs STATE OF GUJARAT .

Citation / case number
SC 2010/13699
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VIPINCHANDRA VADILAL BAVISHI (D) BY LRS & ANR.
Respondent
STATE OF GUJARAT .
Author
M.Y. EQBAL
Bench
C. NAGAPPAN M.Y. EQBAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Gujarat High Court's decision that the appellants were not entitled to benefits under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999, as they failed to prove their claim regarding the excess land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The Court emphasized that the appellants did not adequately challenge the notifications issued under Sections 10(1) and 10(3) of the Act of 1976, which declared their land as surplus. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's ruling.

VIPINCHANDRA VADILAL BAVISHI (D) BY LRS & ANR. vs STATE OF GUJARAT . · Niyam