Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-01-19

STATE OF HARYANA vs EROS CITY DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD..

Citation / case number
SC 2008/7915
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF HARYANA
Respondent
EROS CITY DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD..
Author
Prafulla C. Pant
Bench
PRAFULLA C. PANT RANJAN GOGOI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, regarding the acquisition of land in Faridabad. The Court found that the acquisition was not justified as the earlier proceedings for the same land had been dropped, and the purpose of acquisition for the Surajkund Tourist Complex was not substantiated. Consequently, the Award dated 05.05.2006 was also quashed, affirming the rights of the landowners, including Eros City Developers Pvt. Ltd.

STATE OF HARYANA vs EROS CITY DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.. · Niyam