Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-01-05

Kuldeep Kumar Pathak vs State Of Up And Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT 251
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Kuldeep Kumar Pathak
Respondent
State Of Up And Ors
Author
A.K. Sikri
Bench
Rohinton Fali Nariman, A.K. Sikri

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the cancellation of the appellant's Intermediate Examination results by the U.P. Board was unconstitutional as it violated the principles of natural justice under Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution, given that the appellant was not provided an opportunity to be heard before such drastic action was taken. The Court emphasized that the right to a fair hearing is a fundamental aspect of due process, and the orders of the U.P. Board were quashed, restoring the appellant's examination results and certificates. The Court ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing his appeal against the High Court's dismissal of his writ petition.

Kuldeep Kumar Pathak vs State Of Up And Ors · Niyam