Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-01-19

Bobbili Ramakrishna Raju Yadav & Ors vs State Of A P Rep. By Its Public Prosecutor ...

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Bobbili Ramakrishna Raju Yadav & Ors
Respondent
State Of A P Rep. By Its Public Prosecutor ...
Author
R. Banumathi
Bench
T.S. Thakur, A.K. Sikri, R. Banumathi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to not quash the proceedings against the appellants under Section 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, despite an existing FIR under Sections 304B and 498A IPC. The Court established that the complaint under Section 6 is independent of the earlier case, as it pertains to the non-return of dowry items, which constitutes a separate offence. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the validity of the proceedings against the appellants.

Bobbili Ramakrishna Raju Yadav & Ors vs State Of A P Rep. By Its Public Prosecutor ... · Niyam