Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-02-16

PRADEEP KUMAR ETC ETC vs STATE OF U.P

Citation / case number
SC 2015/23398
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PRADEEP KUMAR ETC ETC
Respondent
STATE OF U.P
Author
ANIL R. DAVE
Bench
ANIL R. DAVE,SHIVA KIRTI SINGH,ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court set aside the impugned judgment regarding land compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, specifically addressing the disparity in compensation rates awarded to the appellants compared to similarly situated land acquired earlier. The Court noted that the High Court failed to adequately discuss the valuation and location of the land, leading to a remand for reconsideration. The appeals were allowed with no order as to costs, and the Court emphasized the need for timely payment of compensation to the landowners.

PRADEEP KUMAR ETC ETC vs STATE OF U.P · Niyam