Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-02-12

U P S R T C vs MAMTA

Citation / case number
SC 2014/28645
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
U P S R T C
Respondent
MAMTA
Author
Abhay Manohar Sapre
Bench
ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE J. CHELAMESWAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the award of compensation under Sections 140 and 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for the death of Raj Kumar Gautam in a vehicular accident caused by the appellant's bus. The Court found that the High Court had failed to adequately address the factual details and legal principles raised by the appellant in its appeal, thus affirming the Tribunal's decision while emphasizing the need for thorough judicial scrutiny in first appeals under Section 173 of the M.V. Act. The appeal was dismissed, maintaining the awarded compensation of Rs.24,73,252 with interest.

U P S R T C vs MAMTA · Niyam