Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-02-26

NASIK MUNICIPAL CORP. vs M/S R.M. BHANDARI

Citation / case number
SC 2011/12648
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
NASIK MUNICIPAL CORP.
Respondent
M/S R.M. BHANDARI
Author
R. BANUMATHI
Bench
R. BANUMATHI T.S. THAKUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the Nashik Municipal Corporation's application to extend the time for depositing costs under the order dated 03.05.2010, emphasizing that the respondents failed to comply with the condition of depositing the decretal amount as mandated by the stay order. The Court reiterated that non-compliance with court orders can lead to automatic vacation of stays, thereby affirming the principle that adherence to procedural requirements is essential for maintaining legal remedies. The appeal was dismissed, reinforcing the importance of compliance in civil proceedings.

NASIK MUNICIPAL CORP. vs M/S R.M. BHANDARI · Niyam