Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-02-09

BHARAMAPPA GOGI vs PRAVEEN MURTHY & ORS. ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 2010/31205
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BHARAMAPPA GOGI
Respondent
PRAVEEN MURTHY & ORS. ETC.
Author
AMITAVA ROY
Bench
AMITAVA ROY S.A. BOBDE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeals challenging the High Court's decision to interfere with the trial court's conviction of the respondents under Sections 390/392/457 read with Section 34 IPC, while acquitting them of Section 302 IPC. The Court held that the High Court erred in its analysis and appreciation of evidence, particularly in acquitting two respondents of murder charges. The Court upheld the High Court's order to remand the case for fresh consideration, including framing charges under Section 397 IPC, thereby emphasizing the need for thorough examination of circumstantial evidence in serious criminal cases.

BHARAMAPPA GOGI vs PRAVEEN MURTHY & ORS. ETC. · Niyam