Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-02-15

CHANDRAKANT ADINATH UTTURE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

Citation / case number
SC 2010/22217
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CHANDRAKANT ADINATH UTTURE
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .
Author
KURIAN
Bench
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN KURIAN JOSEPH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the applicability of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986, specifically focusing on the procedural requirements under Section 13 regarding the declaration of affected and benefitted zones. The Court held that any change in the slab for land acquisition necessitates a fresh notice to the affected parties, emphasizing the importance of due process in land acquisition matters. The judgment affirmed the necessity of adhering to procedural safeguards to ensure fair rehabilitation of affected persons.

CHANDRAKANT ADINATH UTTURE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . · Niyam