Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-02-08

RICHA MISHRA vs STATE OF CHHATISGARH .

Citation / case number
SC 2010/18262
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RICHA MISHRA
Respondent
STATE OF CHHATISGARH .
Author
A.K. SIKRI
Bench
ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the eligibility criteria for the appointment of Deputy Superintendent of Police under the Chhattisgarh Police Executive (Gazetted) Service Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2000, specifically Rule 8 concerning age relaxation for government servants. The Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's writ petition, affirming that she was ineligible for age relaxation as her appointment as Excise Sub Inspector occurred after the cut-off date of January 1, 2006. Consequently, the Court ruled that the appellant's non-inclusion in the successful candidates' list was justified, leading to the dismissal of her appeal.

RICHA MISHRA vs STATE OF CHHATISGARH . · Niyam