Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-02-04

C.B.I.,BANK SECURITIES & FRAUD CELL vs RAMESH GELLI .

Citation / case number
SC 2010/10437
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
C.B.I.,BANK SECURITIES & FRAUD CELL
Respondent
RAMESH GELLI .
Author
PRAFULLA C. PANT RANJAN GOGOI
Bench
PRAFULLA C. PANT RANJAN GOGOI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted the definition of 'public servant' under Section 2(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, emphasizing that a person must hold an office that requires or authorizes them to perform a public duty as defined in Section 2(b). The Court clarified that the performance of public duties alone does not qualify an individual as a public servant unless they hold a designated office. The judgment upheld the necessity of a clear understanding of 'office' and 'public duty' in determining the status of a public servant under the Act.

C.B.I.,BANK SECURITIES & FRAUD CELL vs RAMESH GELLI . · Niyam