Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-02-15

Chandrakant Adinath Utture vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT 893
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Chandrakant Adinath Utture
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra & Ors
Bench
Rohinton Fali Nariman, Kurian Joseph

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986, a public notice is required when there is a change in the slab affecting land acquisition, as per Section 13(2). The Court found that the High Court's interpretation, which stated that no notice was necessary for changes in the slab, was incorrect. The judgment clarified that affected persons must be notified of any changes that impact their land rights, thereby ensuring compliance with the statutory requirements of the Act.

Chandrakant Adinath Utture vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors · Niyam