Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-02-15

N.Venkateshappa vs Munemma & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT 889
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
N.Venkateshappa
Respondent
Munemma & Ors
Author
Uday Umesh Lalit
Bench
Uday Umesh Lalit, V. Gopala Gowda

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the implications of the Karnataka Village Offices Act, 1961, particularly Sections 4 and 5, regarding the abolition of hereditary village offices and the resumption of land. The Court held that any transfer of land in contravention of Section 5(4) is null and void, and such land shall be forfeited to the State, reinforcing the principle that unauthorized transfers are not recognized under the law. The judgment clarified the rights of holders of village offices and the process of eviction of unauthorized holders under Section 7, emphasizing the finality of eviction orders and the lack of judicial review.

N.Venkateshappa vs Munemma & Ors · Niyam