Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-12-16

Lalita Ramesh Lase & Ors vs Jairaj Kantilal Sonawala & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2017 SUPREME COURT 180
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Lalita Ramesh Lase & Ors
Respondent
Jairaj Kantilal Sonawala & Ors
Author
Amitava Roy
Bench
Amitava Roy, Dipak Misra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the claims of tenants under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948, specifically under Section 70(B), regarding their status as protected tenants. The Court held that the High Court's rejection of the tenants' claims was erroneous, as the Tehsildar had previously recognized their status based on substantial evidence of long-term cultivation. The Court reinstated the Tribunal's order for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of evidence to determine tenancy rights.

Lalita Ramesh Lase & Ors vs Jairaj Kantilal Sonawala & Ors · Niyam