Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-12-05

Maharao Bhim Singh Thr.Maharao ... vs C.I.T.,Jaipur

Citation / case number
AIR 2017 SUPREME COURT 142
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Maharao Bhim Singh Thr.Maharao ...
Respondent
C.I.T.,Jaipur
Author
Abhay Manohar Sapre
Bench
Abhay Manohar Sapre, Ranjan Gogoi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the taxability of rental income derived by the appellant, the Ruler of Kota, from a portion of his official residence, Umed Bhawan Palace, requisitioned by the Ministry of Defence. The Court interpreted Section 10(19A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concluding that the exemption from income tax applies to the entire official residence, not just the portion occupied by the appellant. The Court upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in favor of the appellant, confirming that he is entitled to the full benefit of the exemption.

Maharao Bhim Singh Thr.Maharao ... vs C.I.T.,Jaipur · Niyam