Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-12-14

Mears Group Inc vs Fernas Insaat A.S. (Fernas ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2017 SC 183
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mears Group Inc
Respondent
Fernas Insaat A.S. (Fernas ...
Author
D Y Chandrachud
Bench
T.S. Thakur, D.Y. Chandrachud

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner is entitled to seek the appointment of a sole arbitrator due to the respondent's failure to respond to the request for arbitration. The Court emphasized that the arbitration agreement's provisions must be adhered to, and the lack of response from the respondent constituted a refusal to proceed with arbitration. Consequently, the Court appointed an arbitrator to resolve the disputes between the parties, affirming the binding nature of the arbitration clause.

Mears Group Inc vs Fernas Insaat A.S. (Fernas ... · Niyam