Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-08-26

JAMSHED ANSARI vs HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD .

Citation / case number
SC 2015/21557
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
JAMSHED ANSARI
Respondent
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD .
Author
A.K. SIKRI
Bench
N.V. RAMANA A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Rule 3 and Rule 3A of Chapter XXIV of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952, stating that these rules do not violate Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that the rules are designed to regulate the practice of advocates in the High Court and ensure that only those on the Roll of Advocates can represent clients. The appeal challenging the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition was therefore rejected, affirming the High Court's earlier decision in Shashi Kant Upadhyay's case.

JAMSHED ANSARI vs HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD . · Niyam