Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-08-23

KUMAR ALUMINIUM LTD vs ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY INDIA LTD

Citation / case number
SC 2014/38425
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KUMAR ALUMINIUM LTD
Respondent
ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY INDIA LTD
Author
Kurian
Bench
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN KURIAN JOSEPH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 18(1) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, a pre-deposit is not a secured asset and must be refunded unless appropriated by the Appellate Tribunal with consent. The Court set aside the High Court's judgment and the DRAT's order, remitting the matter for fresh consideration. The ruling clarifies the conditions under which a refund of the pre-deposit is permissible.

KUMAR ALUMINIUM LTD vs ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY INDIA LTD · Niyam