Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-08-12

B.BAL REDDY vs TEEGALA NARAYANA REDDY .

Citation / case number
SC 2010/37371
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
B.BAL REDDY
Respondent
TEEGALA NARAYANA REDDY .
Author
Uday Umesh Lalit

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the orders of the Deputy Collector and Mandal Revenue Officer under Sections 32 and 40 of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, affirming the grant of a Succession Certificate to the heirs of Teegala Shivaiah, a Protected Tenant, and the subsequent restoration of possession of the agricultural land. The Court clarified that the appellants, who claimed ownership through subsequent sales, lacked locus standi to challenge the orders as they were neither original landholders nor Protected Tenants. The Court emphasized the validity of the succession proceedings despite the time elapsed since the Protected Tenant's death, thereby reinforcing the rights of the heirs under the Act.

B.BAL REDDY vs TEEGALA NARAYANA REDDY . · Niyam