Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-08-29

Commnr.,Central Excise, Madras vs M/S. Adison & Co. Ltd

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT 4007
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commnr.,Central Excise, Madras
Respondent
M/S. Adison & Co. Ltd
Author
L. Nageswara Rao
Bench
L. Nageswara Rao, Amitava Roy, Anil R. Dave

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of Section 11-B and Section 12-B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, concerning the eligibility for refund claims of excise duty. The Court held that the burden of proof lies with the Assessee to demonstrate that the full incidence of duty has not been passed on to the buyers, as stipulated in Section 12-B. The judgment clarified the procedural requirements for refund applications and upheld the decision of the Collector of Central Excise granting the refund, thereby reinforcing the Assessee's entitlement under the amended provisions of the Act.

Commnr.,Central Excise, Madras vs M/S. Adison & Co. Ltd · Niyam