Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-08-22

M/S.I.P.& Investment Corpn.Of Orissa ... vs New India Assurance Co. Ltd.And Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT 3908
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S.I.P.& Investment Corpn.Of Orissa ...
Respondent
New India Assurance Co. Ltd.And Anr
Author
L. Nageswara Rao
Bench
L. Nageswara Rao, Anil R. Dave

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the applicability of the Burglary and House Breaking Policy under the Miscellaneous Accident Policy, specifically addressing the interpretation of 'theft following an actual forcible and violent entry' as per the insurance terms. The Court held that the requirement of forcible entry is not a prerequisite for a valid claim under the policy, thereby establishing that theft alone suffices for coverage. The appeal was allowed, overturning the MRTP Commission's rejection of the claim, emphasizing the principle of contra proferentem in insurance contracts.

M/S.I.P.& Investment Corpn.Of Orissa ... vs New India Assurance Co. Ltd.And Anr · Niyam