Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-08-09

Vijay Kumar Mishra And Anr vs High Court Of Judicature At Patna To And ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT 3698
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vijay Kumar Mishra And Anr
Respondent
High Court Of Judicature At Patna To And ...
Bench
J. Chelameswar, Abhay Manohar Sapre

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the interpretation of Article 233(2) of the Constitution of India, which restricts members of the Judicial Service from participating in the selection process for the post of District Judge Entry Level. The Court held that the High Court's refusal to allow the petitioners to appear for the interview was justified, as they had joined the Subordinate Judicial Service before the interview date, thus disqualifying them under Article 233(2). The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision.

Vijay Kumar Mishra And Anr vs High Court Of Judicature At Patna To And ... · Niyam