Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-08-08

Arvind Kumar vs State Of U.P.& Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT 3651
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Arvind Kumar
Respondent
State Of U.P.& Ors
Author
R.F. Nariman
Bench
Dipak Misra, Rohinton Fali Nariman

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, particularly focusing on Section 31 of the 1976 Amendment Act, to determine whether ceiling proceedings had lapsed. The Court held that the proceedings did not abate as no fresh notice was issued under Section 9(2) of the Amendment Act, thereby affirming the decisions of the lower authorities. The judgment clarified the procedural requirements for declaring land as surplus and the implications of the Amendment Acts on ongoing proceedings.

Arvind Kumar vs State Of U.P.& Ors · Niyam