Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-08-02

Lourdes Sty.Snehanjali Girls ... vs M/S H & R Jhonson(I) Ltd.& Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT 3572
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Lourdes Sty.Snehanjali Girls ...
Respondent
M/S H & R Jhonson(I) Ltd.& Ors
Author
V.Gopala Gowda
Bench
R. Banumathi, V. Gopala Gowda, T.S. Thakur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the findings of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum and the State Commission that the tiles supplied by the respondents were defective, constituting an unfair trade practice under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court confirmed the order for compensation of Rs. 2,00,000 with interest, emphasizing the liability of the respondents for the manufacturing defects. The appeal by the respondents was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decisions and the principle that consumers are entitled to compensation for defective goods under the Act.

Lourdes Sty.Snehanjali Girls ... vs M/S H & R Jhonson(I) Ltd.& Ors · Niyam