Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2016

Supreme Court of India · 2016-08-26

Jamshed Ansari vs High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad & ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SC (CIVIL) 2859
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Jamshed Ansari
Respondent
High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad & ...
Author
A.K. Sikri
Bench
N.V. Ramana, A.K. Sikri

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Rule 3 and Rule 3A of Chapter XXIV of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952, stating that these rules do not violate Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that the rules are designed to ensure that only advocates who are registered with the local Bar Council can represent clients in the Allahabad High Court, thereby maintaining the integrity of legal practice in the region. The appeal against the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition was rejected, affirming the constitutionality of the rules in question.

Jamshed Ansari vs High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad & ... · Niyam