Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-09-15

STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE CEN.CRIME BRANCH vs R.VASANTHI STANLEY & ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 2012/24918
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE CEN.CRIME BRANCH
Respondent
R.VASANTHI STANLEY & ANR.
Author
Dipak Misra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether criminal proceedings should be quashed after a settlement between borrowers and banks regarding forged documents used to secure loans. The Court held that the continuance of such proceedings would be an unnecessary burden on the criminal justice system, thus affirming the High Court's decision to quash the criminal proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the CrPC. The Court emphasized the importance of fiscal sanctity and the need to prevent misuse of the legal system by borrowers who engage in fraudulent practices.

STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE CEN.CRIME BRANCH vs R.VASANTHI STANLEY & ANR. · Niyam