Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-09-14

P.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY vs DIST.INSP.OF POLICE

Citation / case number
SC 2008/20278
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
P.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Respondent
DIST.INSP.OF POLICE
Author
AMITAVA ROY
Bench
H.L. DATTU,V. GOPALA GOWDA,AMITAVA ROY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 13(1)(d)(i) & (ii) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, affirming the High Court's decision while setting aside the conviction under Section 7 of the Act. The Court found that the prosecution had sufficiently established the demand for illegal gratification, which constituted a vital ingredient of the offence under the cited sections. Consequently, the appellant's sentence was sustained, emphasizing the importance of proving demand in corruption cases.

P.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY vs DIST.INSP.OF POLICE · Niyam