Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-09-07

TATA ENG & LOCOMOTIVE CO.LTD vs DIRECTOR(RESEARCH)O/B DEEPAK KHANNA &ORS

Citation / case number
SC 2006/9502
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
TATA ENG & LOCOMOTIVE CO.LTD
Respondent
DIRECTOR(RESEARCH)O/B DEEPAK KHANNA &ORS
Author
SHIVA KIRTI SINGH
Bench
SHIVA KIRTI SINGH VIKRAMAJIT SEN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, in Civil Appeal No. 2069 of 2006, addressed the issue of unfair trade practices under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969. The Court held that the appellant's practice of demanding a high booking amount for Tata Indica cars did not constitute an unfair trade practice as there were no complaints from actual customers who booked or withdrew their deposits. The Court emphasized that the complaints were from individuals who were deterred by the booking amount, not from those who engaged in the transaction, thus upholding the Commission's order to cease and desist was not warranted.

TATA ENG & LOCOMOTIVE CO.LTD vs DIRECTOR(RESEARCH)O/B DEEPAK KHANNA &ORS · Niyam