Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-09-01

Bhadresh Bipinbhai Sheth vs State Of Gujarat & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2015 SUPREME COURT 3090
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Bhadresh Bipinbhai Sheth
Respondent
State Of Gujarat & Anr
Author
A.K. Sikri
Bench
Rohinton Fali Nariman, A.K. Sikri

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's cancellation of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was unjustified, as the original FIR did not include allegations of rape, and the charge under Section 376 IPC was added only in 2014, long after the initial complaint. The Court emphasized that the delay in framing charges and the nature of allegations must be considered when assessing the necessity of anticipatory bail. Consequently, the Court reinstated the anticipatory bail granted to the appellant by the Sessions Court.

Bhadresh Bipinbhai Sheth vs State Of Gujarat & Anr · Niyam