Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-09-22

Internl.Adv.Res.Cen.For P.M.& N.M.& ... vs Nimra Cerglass (P) Ltd.& Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Internl.Adv.Res.Cen.For P.M.& N.M.& ...
Respondent
Nimra Cerglass (P) Ltd.& Anr
Author
R. Banumathi
Bench
R. Banumathi, J.S. Khehar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the appellants' petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings against them under Sections 419 and 420 IPC. The Court established that the allegations of cheating and misrepresentation in a technology transfer agreement were sufficient to warrant criminal proceedings, emphasizing that the nature of the dispute was not purely civil as claimed by the appellants. The Court affirmed that the appellants' representations induced the respondent to incur significant expenses based on false assurances regarding the technology's efficacy.

Internl.Adv.Res.Cen.For P.M.& N.M.& ... vs Nimra Cerglass (P) Ltd.& Anr · Niyam