Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-10-16

SHAILESH DHAIRYAWAN vs MOHAN BALKRISHNA LULLA

Citation / case number
SC 2015/22080
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SHAILESH DHAIRYAWAN
Respondent
MOHAN BALKRISHNA LULLA
Author
R.F. Nariman
Bench
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, specifically regarding the appointment of a substitute arbitrator after the resignation of the original arbitrator. The Court held that the parties must adhere to the arbitration agreement and that the appointment of a substitute arbitrator is permissible to ensure the resolution of disputes as per the consent terms agreed upon. The Court emphasized the need for expediency in arbitration proceedings, thereby reinforcing the principles of arbitration law.

SHAILESH DHAIRYAWAN vs MOHAN BALKRISHNA LULLA · Niyam