Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-10-06

PURNIMA MANTHENA vs DR. RENUKA DATLA .

Citation / case number
SC 2015/13119
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PURNIMA MANTHENA
Respondent
DR. RENUKA DATLA .
Author
AMITAVA ROY V. GOPALA GOWDA
Bench
AMITAVA ROY V. GOPALA GOWDA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed disputes among family members regarding control of Biological E. Limited, following the death of Dr. Vijay Kumar Datla. The Court examined the applicability of Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, in the context of appeals against a Company Law Board decision. The Court held that the High Court's order was justified, affirming the need for proper governance and management of the company amidst familial disputes, thereby upholding the lower court's ruling.

PURNIMA MANTHENA vs DR. RENUKA DATLA . · Niyam