Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-10-15

M/S MANGALORE GANESH BEEDI WORKS vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MYSORE

Citation / case number
SC 2011/12603
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S MANGALORE GANESH BEEDI WORKS
Respondent
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MYSORE
Author
Madan B. Lokur
Bench
S.A. BOBDE MADAN B. LOKUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision regarding the interpretation of Section 37 and Section 35A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, ruling that the Rs. 12,24,700 claimed as revenue expenditure by the Association of Persons was not allowable as a deduction, as it was not incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes. The Court also affirmed that the expenditure on acquiring patent rights and trademarks could not be claimed as a deduction under Section 35A and 35AB. However, it agreed with the Tribunal's direction to capitalize the value of trademarks and grant depreciation, thus partially favoring the Assessee.

M/S MANGALORE GANESH BEEDI WORKS vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MYSORE · Niyam