SANT RAM vs DHAN KAUR .

The Supreme Court addressed an application under Order XVIII Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1966, concerning the refusal to register a clarification application related to a prior order. The Court held that the applicant's predecessor-in-interest had a valid claim for possession and damages due to encroachment, reaffirming the decrees of the lower courts that favored the applicant. The Court ultimately upheld the applicant's right to recover possession and mesne profits, emphasizing the importance of rightful ownership and encroachment laws.