Daya Sah & Ors vs Chandra Datt Pande & Ors

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the plaintiffs' second appeals, confirming that the plaintiffs failed to establish ownership of the suit property located in Habilion compound. The Court noted that the plaintiffs could not identify the suit property and admitted that the defendants had leased the land from Sri Bachi Gaud Trust. The Court emphasized that the concurrent findings of the lower courts were not to be interfered with under Section 100 CPC, and the alleged sale deed dated 17.1.1927 was deemed irrelevant to the case.