Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-10-01

Sudhir vs The State Of Maharashtra & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2015 SUPREME COURT 3665
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sudhir
Respondent
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr
Author
Prafulla C. Pant
Bench
Prafulla C. Pant, Dipak Misra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to cancel anticipatory bail granted to the appellants under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 477A of the IPC and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Court emphasized that the allegations of misappropriation of significant public funds in the execution of drinking water schemes warranted serious scrutiny and that the initial denial of bail by the Additional Sessions Judge indicated the gravity of the charges. The Court affirmed the High Court's findings regarding the misuse of the bail process by the appellants, leading to the cancellation of their anticipatory bail.

Sudhir vs The State Of Maharashtra & Anr · Niyam