Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-10-16

Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record ... vs Union Of India

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record ...
Respondent
Union Of India
Author
Jagdish Singh Khehar
Bench
Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. Chelameswar, Madan B. Lokur, Kurian Joseph, Adarsh Kumar Goel

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the recusal of a judge from a bench, emphasizing the importance of transparency and the need for judges to articulate their reasons for continuing on a bench despite objections. The court underscored that such decisions are not merely procedural but are essential for maintaining public confidence in the judiciary. The court held that the judge's continuation was justified and necessary for the proper adjudication of the matters at hand, thereby reinforcing principles of judicial conduct and accountability.

Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record ... vs Union Of India · Niyam