Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-10-06

M/S. Larsen & Toubro Ltd. Ecc Const.Grp vs C.C.E, Hyderabad

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. Larsen & Toubro Ltd. Ecc Const.Grp
Respondent
C.C.E, Hyderabad
Author
A.K. Sikri
Bench
Rohinton Fali Nariman, A.K. Sikri

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that M/s. Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T) is not entitled to exemption under Notification No. 4/1997-CE for 'Ready Mix Concrete' (RMC) as it is distinct from 'Concrete Mix' (CM) exempted by the notification. The Court affirmed the findings of the Commissioner and CESTAT that RMC, characterized by precision and delivery to customer sites, does not qualify for the same exemption as CM. Consequently, the appeals by L&T were dismissed, upholding the excise duty demand of ₹1,97,47,626.

M/S. Larsen & Toubro Ltd. Ecc Const.Grp vs C.C.E, Hyderabad · Niyam