Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-11-03

HARI NARAYAN BANSAL vs DADA DEV MANDIR PRABANDHAK SABHA (BARAH GAON) PALAM

Citation / case number
SC 2015/516
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HARI NARAYAN BANSAL
Respondent
DADA DEV MANDIR PRABANDHAK SABHA (BARAH GAON) PALAM
Author
S.A. BOBDE ANIL R. DAVE
Bench
S.A. BOBDE ANIL R. DAVE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court is not required to frame a substantial question of law when dismissing a second appeal at the admission stage. The Court found that the dismissal was appropriate as no substantial question of law was involved. The appellants, who have been tenants for 35 years, were granted protection from eviction until December 31, 2016, provided they pay monthly mesne profits of Rs. 1,500 to the respondent.

HARI NARAYAN BANSAL vs DADA DEV MANDIR PRABANDHAK SABHA (BARAH GAON) PALAM · Niyam