Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-05-08

M/S. MAN INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE

Citation / case number
SC 2004/18902
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. MAN INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD.
Respondent
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE
Author
A. K. SIKRI
Bench
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the demand for excise duty under Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, affirming that the appellant, M/s. Maan Aluminium Ltd., was liable for differential duty due to clandestine removal of goods without payment of duty. The Court found that the evidence, including discrepancies in export documents and physical stock, justified the extended period of limitation invoked by the authorities. The appeal against the CESTAT's order was dismissed, confirming the demand of Rs. 64,82,565/- as valid.

M/S. MAN INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE · Niyam