Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-03-13

AMARKANT RAI vs STATE OF BIHAR .

Citation / case number
SC 2013/18800
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
AMARKANT RAI
Respondent
STATE OF BIHAR .
Author
R. BANUMATHI
Bench
R. BANUMATHI V. GOPALA GOWDA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of the appellant's claim for regularization of his service as a daily wage employee, stating that his appointment was not made by a competent authority as per the Bihar State Universities Act, 1976, specifically violating Section 10(6) and Section 35. The Court reiterated the principle established in Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors. v. Umadevi (2006) that irregular appointments cannot be regularized unless they comply with the established recruitment rules. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision that there was no illegality in the rejection of the appellant's claim for regularization.

AMARKANT RAI vs STATE OF BIHAR . · Niyam