Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-03-26

S. SATYANARAYANA vs ENERGO MASCH POWER ENGG.&CONST.P.L.&ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 2009/19452
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S. SATYANARAYANA
Respondent
ENERGO MASCH POWER ENGG.&CONST.P.L.&ORS.
Author
S. A. BOBDE
Bench
S.A. BOBDE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's quashing of proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was improper as the allegations under Section 628 of the Companies Act and Sections 120B and 420 IPC warranted further investigation. The Court emphasized that the complainant's claims of conspiracy and misrepresentation by the accused, including false declarations to open a bank account, necessitated a trial to ascertain the truth. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and reinstated the proceedings against the accused.

S. SATYANARAYANA vs ENERGO MASCH POWER ENGG.&CONST.P.L.&ORS. · Niyam