Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-03-11

EDWARD vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AANDIMADAM P.S.

Citation / case number
SC 2006/11555
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
EDWARD
Respondent
INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AANDIMADAM P.S.
Author
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Bench
R.K. AGRAWAL PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the appeals against the Madras High Court's judgment which modified the conviction of the accused from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 Part II IPC, sentencing them to five years of rigorous imprisonment. The Court held that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to the absence of the treating doctor's testimony and relevant medical documents. Consequently, the Court upheld the High Court's decision, affirming the conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC.

EDWARD vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AANDIMADAM P.S. · Niyam